Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Johnny Socko's avatar

The fact that the log truck accident is still talked about today -- and I don't necessarily mean in cinematic circles, I mean in "I'm now 40 years old and I haven't driven behind a logging truck since this movie" terms -- means that it succeeded as well as any horror film can hope to succeed.

Expand full comment
Matt's avatar

I both love and hate this one. It’s fun, but its logic collapses at every single turn. When the survivors find out the connection they have, it excludes the people who have already been killed. They also spend half the movie looking for someone who doesn’t matter anyway. And the premonition? They’d been driving for at least 5 minutes when the pile-up occurred, but when in reality, it happened less than 1/4th a mile away? Idk if it’s series’ lore — the fifth movie also had a different premonition than how the disaster actually happened — but it always bugged me. I prefer when these movies are unintentionally silly as opposed to intentionally comedic without being funny — see David R. Ellis’s The Final Destination, which offers up characters (a racist, a Karen, a douchebro) who clearly deserve the horrible ends coming to them (the racist uses the N-word, like why do we need that in an FD movie) but it’s just like, if you’re going to make a horror comedy, can you at least be scary or funny? FD2 is fun, but it’s dumb fun, but I kind of wish it was a later entry, like the series took itself on a more straightforward path (like FD3) where it wasn’t laughing at itself and hoping the audience would laugh along too. So yes, it’s fun. But I also think FD2 cut short the potential the series could have had. You don’t need a Jason Lives after just one movie.

Expand full comment

No posts